|
Wines
#1. The color was a
deep garnet, with a hint of brick. The nose was quite
complex, with plenty of rich, smokey leather and black
fruit. Canadian Zinfan noted nuances of licorice, bacon
and pinecone, while Zinchick detected some cooked
molasses. The Director added a hint of olives, which was
seconded by most, while Chanteuse found a touch of
mushroom. The Artist described "a distant elderberry
breeze."
On the palate, the
wine was full-bodied and still quite tannic, yet
approachable. It had gobs of prune and sweet black cherry
flavors, with not so subtle hints of calamata olive and
raisin. The finish wasn't overly long; what did linger
was an earthiness that was not unpleasant. This continued
to open for hours, and was better when tasted a second
time.
#2. This showed a
similar dark garnet, with a bit more of the brick tone
than the first selection. It had a dusty plum and prune
nose, with a touch of cinnamon and currants, according to
the Zinfan. The Director got raw steak and a little old
cigar box, while Zinchick called out oyster shell,
mineral, and talcum powder. And, how in hell did
Chanteuse get "grape popsicle" from this?!
Like the first wine,
this was still tannic; however, it seemed to have less
charm to compensate. We all found the medium bodied fruit
to be dry, and less generous; the Zinfan described it as
"flat, gravelly, and ever so slightly drying
out." Zinchick, in particular, found this to be
generally unpleasant, with "a dry finish that
lingers longer than you want." This taster's
impressions were not so unkind, but there was no denying
that it suffered in comparison with the initial bottle.
The Geek wondered if it wasn't over the hill. The
Bookseller said he'd finish a bottle, but wouldn't buy
another.
#3. This immediately
elicited "mmms" from several of the attendees.
It had none of the mature brick tone to it's dark garnet
color, and was denser in texture than the rest of the
field (The Geek described it as "velvety"; a
hint that it was a different animal?) The nose had a
certain opulence, with rich, flowery, perfumed black
fruit and raspberry that echoed in the flavors, with
added blueberry, black raspberry, and leather nuances. It
was quite acidic, and richer than the first two wines.
The Artist described it as having "a roomful of
flavor."
Surprisingly, Zinchick
described this as "barnyardy, with no fruit,"
but hers was definitely the minority opinion.
#4. The next selection
had the obligatory garnet/hint of brick color, and most
were struck by its gamy nose. It exuded aromas of ripe
burger, leather, tobacco, and horehound candy; the
gaminess subsided somewhat to reveal prunes and black
cherries, sweet spice, and anise. Zinchick's first
impression was "dirt," which she found
unpleasant.
In the mouth, this was
the least tannic, so far, with a nice, silky texture. The
flavors showed none of the gaminess that was so prevalent
in the nose; they echoed the other aromas and may have
been the most complex of the bunch. (Again, Zinchick
disagreed; she found it to be flat and tired.) It was The
Artist's favorite wine of the flight. However, the ripe
meat aroma detracted enough for most tasters to score it
lower than they otherwise might have.
#5. Another brick
rimmed, dark garnet colored wine, with a dirty nose that
initially overpowered any fruit, and never quite
subsided. Some pruned, walnut shell, and potato notes
managed to poke their way through with some air.
Chartreuse was reminded of furniture polish.
The flavors were
rather metallic, though not in a bad way. Most found them
to be not as deep as the rest of the competition. Perhaps
surprisingly, C.Z. found this to feature "complex,
integrated fruit flavors, with a medium long
finish," and scored it higher than the others.
Afterwards, scores
were compiled, and the Gigondas was the upset favorite in
the midst of the Châteauneuf du Papes by a clear three
corks. This taster found it to be the richest, most
seductive of the five, and is most pleased to have
another five in "the cellar."
The Results
|
|
The Gang of
Pour
Continue
HOME PAGE
|